Drawing for DUALITY

USPTO serial 79020985

DUALITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3623068Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 19, 2009
Examiner
BELZER, LYDIA M
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUALITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan F. Evans

SUSAN F. EVANS % HENKEL OF AMERICA, INC.19001 N SCOTTSDALE RDLEGAL SEPT., M.S. 04.50SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255-9672

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair preparations for caring, cleaning, conditioning, treating, tinting, dyeing, bleaching, styling, fixing and permingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 14, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 25, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 20, 2009CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Oct 16, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 10, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 27, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 19, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 19, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 27, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 14, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 31, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jun 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 26, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 6, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 23, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 23, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 14, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 15, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 14, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 14, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance