Drawing for EDARD

USPTO serial 79020998

EDARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3233644Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 24, 2007
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with EDARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal closures for boxes, bottles and containers; metal sealing caps for bottles, metal bottle capsACTIVE
020[ Non-metal, non-paper, closures for boxes, bottles and containers; corks for bottles, bottle sealing caps not of metal, non-metal bottle caps ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 12, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 17, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Aug 6, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 6, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Dec 6, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Nov 28, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 17, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 24, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Apr 24, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 19, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 29, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 24, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
May 28, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 28, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Sep 28, 2012C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Sep 27, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 5, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Sep 5, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Aug 31, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 9, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 11, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 4, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 4, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 27, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 24, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 18, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 17, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 27, 2006CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Mar 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance