Drawing for Serial No. 79021007

USPTO serial 79021007

Serial No. 79021007

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SISUN, SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79021007?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gerald H. Kiel

GERALD H KIEL REED SMITH LLP599 LEXINGTON AVE 29TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MicrophonesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jun 23, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 28, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 3, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 28, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 28, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 6, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 28, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 28, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 23, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 30, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 30, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 26, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 26, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Dec 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 22, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 24, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance