USPTO serial 79021032
COOLFLUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3245123Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 2007
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COOLFLUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia R. Adwere
Cynthia R. Adwere LAW OFFICE OF CYNTHIA R. ADWERE2625 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD # 360PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Integrated circuits, computer chips, diodes, transistors, semi-conductors, ] digital signal processors and computer software, for use in power applications in decoding and encoding of audio, sound enhancement and noise suppression | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by NXP B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by NXP B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by NXP B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named COOLFLUX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 22, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 15, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |