Drawing for VITALUX

USPTO serial 79021064

VITALUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3240038Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 8, 2007
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VITALUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maury M. Tepper, III (Christine S. Beaman, M. Christopher Bolen, Kathryn M. Eyster, Jack B. Hicks, Sarah Anne Keefe, Fang Liu, Jeffrey R. McFadden, C. Robert Rhodes, Randel S. Springer, Maury M. Tepper, III, Mitchell A. Tuchman)

Maury M. Tepper, III Tepper & Eyster, PLLC3724 Benson DriveRaleigh, NC 27609UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical products, namely pharmaceutical preparations for disorders of the nervous system, the immune system, the cardio-vascular system, the respiratory system, the musculo-skeletal system, for the treatment of inflammatory disorders, diabetes and metabolic diseases, for use in dermatology, in oncology, in hematology, in transplantation, in ophthalmology, for use in the gastroenterological area and in the prevention and treatment of ocular disorders and diseases; pharmaceutical preparations for treating bacteria-based diseases, anti-infectives, anti-bacterials, antivirals, anti-biotics, anti-fungal preparations, vaccines; vitamins, minerals and dietary supplements, namely vitamin preparations for optical healthSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jun 13, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 20, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 8, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 23, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 23, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 7, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 23, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 16, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 23, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance