Drawing for VBC

USPTO serial 79021167

VBC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3275363Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2007
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VBC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD M GOLDBERG

RICHARD M GOLDBERG GOLDBERG PATENT LAW OFFICE25 EAST SALEM STREETSUITE 419HACKENSACK, NJ 07601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and machine tools for viticulture, fruit growing, horticulture and agriculture, namely, leaf strippers, tipping machines, [ mowing and ] reaping machines, clippers and hydraulic bud pruning machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 16, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 26, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 19, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 3, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Mar 22, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 22, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 22, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 22, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 10, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 7, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 7, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 13, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Sep 13, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Sep 13, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Aug 9, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Aug 9, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 29, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 29, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 7, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 12, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Mar 29, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 18, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 9, 2006IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU
Jul 14, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 3, 2006IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB
Jun 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 31, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 30, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance