USPTO serial 79021205
PURAVITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3602571Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 7, 2009
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with PURAVITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clifford D. Hyra
Clifford D. Hyra Fresh IP PLC11710 Plaza America Drive Suite 2000Reston, VA 20190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Bread; flour preparations, namely, mixes for bakery goods; and processed cereals for use in the manufacture of bakery goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |