Drawing for SINASAVE

USPTO serial 79021241

SINASAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3211649Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 20, 2007
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SINASAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marie Anne Mastrovito

Marie Anne Mastrovito Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP950 3rd Avenue, Suite 2400New York, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for calculating energy savings in the field of industrial automationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 10, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 26, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Aug 26, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 26, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Aug 26, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Aug 26, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 26, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
May 17, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 7, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 7, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 7, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 13, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 2, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 1, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED
Sep 1, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Sep 1, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 23, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Jul 23, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 31, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 30, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance