Drawing for SAPORESSE

USPTO serial 79021268

SAPORESSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3537174Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 25, 2008
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAPORESSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN CHRISTOPHER

Joseph R. Englander Christopher & Weisberg PA200 E Las Olas BoulevardSuite 2040Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030yeast; yeast products, namely, yeast extracts, red yeast rice, brewers yeast, lactic yeast extracts, brewers yeast extracts and flavor compounds based on yeast extracts; excluding flavor enhancing sourdough ingredients for bakery goods composed of fermented flour using starter cultures of lactic acid bacteria and/or yeastsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 28, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 28, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 20, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Apr 20, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 26, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 26, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 3, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 7, 2009LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jun 25, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 12, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 12, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 25, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 25, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 20, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS
Oct 20, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Oct 20, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Sep 11, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 14, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 28, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Aug 27, 2007OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB
Aug 25, 2007OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED
Jul 25, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 27, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 27, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 27, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 27, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 13, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 29, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 14, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 6, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance