USPTO serial 79021353
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CECELIA M PERRY
CECELIA M PERRY SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW & TUTTLE PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-9227UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal tokens for use as a substitute for money; laminated metal foils and metal films for packaging purposes; semi finished laminated metal foils and metal films for packaging purposes and semi finished metal tokens for use as a substitute for money | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Die stamping machines; embossing top dies and embossing bottom dies for use in embossing machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Diffractive optically variable image devices ("dovids"), namely, devices for creating holograms or patterns with diffraction effect that are used in particular for the purpose of authenticity identification or genuineness of legal tender, back notes, bank and credit cards, vouchers, cheques, and securities | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Embossed reflective security holograms for packaging for products and decoration of products; printed reflective security holograms for packaging for products and decoration of products; packing material made of paper; packing material made of plastic, namely, plastic bags, plastic bubble packs and plastic packaging foils | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Foils and films, namely, self adhesive plastic foils and films, non-self adhesive plastic foils and films, plastic laminates, and embossed films predominantly containing neutralized plastic, all for use in the production of diffractive optically variable image devices ("dovids") and reflective security holograms | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Application of optical security elements, such as holograms, to bank-notes, bank cards, credit cards, vouchers, cheques, and other paper monetary instruments; application of optical security elements, such as holograms, to packaging of goods; custom manufacturing of tools, namely, embossing top dies and embossing bottom dies used for the purpose of embossing diffractive optically variable image devices ("dovids") in objects; custom manufacture of dies by laser-cutting and galvanic methods used for the purpose of embossing diffractive optically variable image devices in objects | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical and scientific consulting concerning the development and design of optical security elements and substitutes for money; technical and scientific consulting for the design and development of methods of identification and authentication for objects; creating designs and graphics for diffractive optically variable image devices ("dovids"), such as security holograms, for others; creation of holograms and gratings with various diffraction effects for security purposes for others; design of copies of holograms and other designs which use optical diffraction, by means of the electroforming processes; recombination of holograms or of other diffraction designs; design of optical security elements in the nature of holograms and optical diffractive patterns for use on product packages and for use on money and on token-money | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 15, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |