Drawing for KESKO

USPTO serial 79021378

KESKO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3356515Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 18, 2007
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KESKO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine B. Redfield

CHRISTINE B REDFIELD KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM630 HANSEN WAYPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk; cream; edible oils and fatsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal-based snack foods, ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars, breakfast cereals, corn flakes, maize flakes, oat flakes, bread, pastry, honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, condiment sauces; spicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
031Agricultural products, namely flower seeds; agricultural grains for planting; live animals; fresh fruit and vegetables; agricultural seeds, natural living plants and cut flowers; foodstuffs for animals, malt for brewing and distillingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
032Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic soft drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
035Advertising services; business administration and management; providing office functionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 28, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 31, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 15, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jul 15, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Mar 25, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 25, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 2, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 2, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 18, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 6, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 3, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 3, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 6, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance