Drawing for AERCAP

USPTO serial 79021389

AERCAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3356516Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 18, 2007
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with AERCAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Catherine Merz

Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.408 MADISON STREET, SUITE AOak Park, IL 60302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ airplane motors and airplane engines; used airplane parts, namely, aircraft-specific hydraulic turbines, pneumatic door closers; used airplane engine parts, namely, aircraft specific engine bearings, combustion chamber parts in the nature of pistons and piston rings, air compressors, hydraulic turbines, and engine exhaust tips ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012[ Airplanes ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Business management; business administration; office functions; business mediation in relation to sales of airplanes and parts of airplanes; office functions for the benefit of "portfolio management" in relation to the leasing of airplanes and parts of airplanesACTIVE—
036Insurance consultation; financial services, namely aircraft lease financing; consultancy in relation to insurance, finance, lease financing and financial servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 2, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 19, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 15, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 18, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 31, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 8, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2014C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 30, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 17, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 15, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 6, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance