USPTO serial 79021524
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
87437 Kempten, DE
87437 Kempten, DE
87437 Kempten, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary L. Shapiro
MARY L SHAPIRO TOWNSEND & TOWNSEND & CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Extruded hard metal rods being parts of machines and drilling tools, saw teeth being parts of sawing machines, power paper cutters for paper machining, metalworking machine tools for shaping machines and technology being parts of shaping machines, rolling machines, drawing machines, punching machines and forming machines, wearing parts of hard metal, cermets, ceramics and super hard materials for machine tools, tool systems comprising tool holders and cutting, turning, milling, boring and drilling inserts, bits and blades to be inserted in the tool holders, clamping tools for power operated machines for tool and work piece clamping, automated tool systems comprising tool holders and cutting tools, cutting machine tools for processing metal and plastics, namely turning tools, plug-in tools, thread cutting tools, borers, milling machines, milling cutters, power operated saws, friction tools, sink tools and parts for the aforesaid machine tools, namely replaceable cutters of high-speed steel, hard metal, synthetic, ceramic and other cutting materials | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Furniture for factory and warehouse facilities, namely tool cabinets, warehouse storage racks, free standing tool racks and shelving and work benches | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical support and applications consultancy, namely process and tool designing for cutting machine tools for processing metal and plastic, namely turning tools, plug-in tools, thread cutting tools, borers, milling machines, milling cutters, saws, friction tools, sink tools, parts for the aforesaid tools, namely replaceable cutters of high-speed steel, hard metal, synthetic, ceramic or other cutting materials, extruded hard metal rods, saw teeth, paper cutters, tools for forming technology, working parts of hard metal, cermets ceramic and super hard materials, tool systems, design and development of online computer programs and software for logistics, tool management systems, machine control and commercial function areas, namely those used in connection with the internet and e-commerce; technical support services, namely trouble shooting of computer hardware and software problems | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 12, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |