Drawing for VIACTIV

USPTO serial 79021561

VIACTIV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VIACTIV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Creams, emulsions, lotions, gels and oils for hand, face and feet; face masks; foundations; make-up powders, powders used after bath; perfumes, toilet water, cologne, fragrant water for personal use; bath and shower preparations namely non-medicated bath and shower salt, foam, oil, gel; depilatories; antiperspirants for personal use; hair care preparations namely hair dyes, hair color lighteners, hair waving, hair fixing and hair straightening preparations namely hair lotions, hair powder, hair shampoos, hair balsams, hair styling preparations namely hair spray, hair lotions; hair brilliantine; product used for shaving namely shaving creams, foam, lotions; product used for facial and eye makeup namely eye shadow, mascara, eyeliner, eye pencils; products prepared to be used for lips namely lipsticks, lip glosser, lip liners; mouth and teeth care preparations namely tooth paste, tooth powders, non-medicated oral waters, non-medicated oral spray, products used for nail care and ornamenting namely nail polish, nail hardener, nail nutritive, nail polish remover, manicure gel; cosmetic sun-tanning preparations; products providing tanned look for the skin without the sun; products used to lighten the color of the skin; anti-wrinkle preparations; toilet soaps, deodorant soap; baby care preparations for non-medical purposes namely baby shampoo, baby oil, baby lotion and baby cream, pre-moistened cosmetic tissues, baby cologne, baby powder, baby hand cleansing gel, baby hand lotion, baby hand creamSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2010DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 19, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 14, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 28, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 13, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 13, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 27, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 25, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 13, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance