Drawing for PACKFEEDER

USPTO serial 79021593

PACKFEEDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3348716Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 4, 2007
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PACKFEEDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Franklin Rothwell

CLARKE, MODET Y COMPAÑIA, SLC/ GOYA, NúM. 11E MADRID, 28001SPAIN

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MACHINES AND MACHINE TOOLS, NAMELY, BOTTLE UNSCRAMBLING AND/OR ORIENTING MACHINES; MACHINES FOR PLACING PLASTIC BOTTLES IN A VERTICAL POSITIONSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 16, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 13, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 4, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2018FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 22, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 22, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 14, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 29, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 11, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 4, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 28, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 6, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance