USPTO serial 79021593
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Franklin Rothwell
CLARKE, MODET Y COMPAÑIA, SLC/ GOYA, NúM. 11E MADRID, 28001SPAIN| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES AND MACHINE TOOLS, NAMELY, BOTTLE UNSCRAMBLING AND/OR ORIENTING MACHINES; MACHINES FOR PLACING PLASTIC BOTTLES IN A VERTICAL POSITION | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |