Drawing for COCKTA LIGHT

USPTO serial 79021659

COCKTA LIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3340125Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2007
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COCKTA LIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JENNIFER FRASER

JENNIFER FRASER CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP333 S. GRAND AVESUITE 2300LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-1504

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Bottles and plastic bottles, sold emptySECTION 71 - CANCELLED
032Mineral waters; soft drinks; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, aerated waters; fruit drinks; fruit juices; syrups, concentrates and powders used in the preparation of fruit drinksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
039Merchandise packaging of articles for transportation, namely, packaging beverages, particularly mineral waters, aerated waters, non-alcoholic drinks, soft drinks, fruit drinks and fruit juicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Sep 1, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 1, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 24, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 6, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Feb 27, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 27, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 18, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
May 14, 2010EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 27, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 27, 2008COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Feb 27, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Jan 11, 2008AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED
Jan 11, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 5, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 20, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 20, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 6, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 26, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Jul 25, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 20, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance