Drawing for ARROVIDE

USPTO serial 79021661

ARROVIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3256622Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 26, 2007
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ARROVIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony A. Bisulca

Anthony A. Bisulca Clariant Corporation4000 Monroe RoadIntectual Property Dept.CHARLOTTE, NC 28205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in industryACTIVE—
002[ Paints; ] colorants [ and dyes ] for general industrial use; [ lacquers; ] pigments; pigment preparations, namely, preparations containing organic or inorganic pigments in dispersed form for use in plastics; wood coatings, namely, varnishes, varnish coatings and wood paints; [ rust preventatives in the nature of a coating; ] rust preventatives in the nature of a coating [ for protecting metals; printing inks ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 1, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 15, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 5, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 5, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 26, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 16, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 15, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 18, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Dec 18, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance