Drawing for ARROVIDE

USPTO serial 79021661

ARROVIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3256622Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 26, 2007
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ARROVIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony A. Bisulca

Anthony A. Bisulca Clariant Corporation4000 Monroe RoadIntectual Property Dept.CHARLOTTE, NC 28205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in industryACTIVE
002[ Paints; ] colorants [ and dyes ] for general industrial use; [ lacquers; ] pigments; pigment preparations, namely, preparations containing organic or inorganic pigments in dispersed form for use in plastics; wood coatings, namely, varnishes, varnish coatings and wood paints; [ rust preventatives in the nature of a coating; ] rust preventatives in the nature of a coating [ for protecting metals; printing inks ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 1, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 18, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 19, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 15, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Mar 15, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Mar 5, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 5, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 5, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 26, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 11, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 16, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jan 16, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jan 15, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 18, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Dec 18, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 13, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 26, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 20, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance