Drawing for ROKEM

USPTO serial 79021800

ROKEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3184125Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 12, 2006
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ROKEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Prakash Nama

Prakash Nama Global IP Services, PLLC4621 Chestnut St,Bethesda, MD 20814United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001[ Chemical preservatives for use in the manufacture of a wide variety of chemicals; ] vulcanization accelerators; chemical rubber preservatives; chemical catalysts for use in intensifying rubber; [ chemical food preservative compositions; ] adhesives for general industrial use; agricultural seed preservatives; chemical additives for use in the manufacture of fungicides; [ antranilic acid; ] and chemical preparations for use in the vulcanization of rubberACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 14, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 13, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 21, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Dec 12, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 9, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Sep 9, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 7, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Aug 3, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 3, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 12, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 24, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 10, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Aug 1, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Aug 1, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Aug 1, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 13, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 13, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 3, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 19, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 12, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 30, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 20, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance