Drawing for THE GLENLIVET

USPTO serial 79021938

THE GLENLIVET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3505410Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 23, 2008
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE GLENLIVET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Meyer A Gross

MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVENUE19TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, whiskies, malt whiskies, beverages made from or containing whisky, beverages made from or containing malts, aperitifs containing whisky, liqueurs made from or containing whisky, liqueurs made from or containing malts, ready-to-drink alcoholic drinks containing any of the aforementioned, cocktails containing any of the aforementioned; distilled spirits, wines, liqueurs; distilled beverages, namely, distilled spirits; whisky; malt whisky; whisky liqueurs; beverages made from or containing whisky; aperitifs; alcoholic cocktails; but insofar as whisky and whisky based liqueurs are concerned, only scotch whisky and scotch whisky based liqueurs produced in ScotlandSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 13, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 16, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 27, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 27, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 11, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Dec 24, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 10, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 24, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 4, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 12, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 13, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 13, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 23, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 14, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 23, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 24, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 23, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 23, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 19, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 1, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 5, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 15, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 26, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 26, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 25, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance