Drawing for CRYOBANK

USPTO serial 79021979

CRYOBANK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRYOBANK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Hale

John S. Hale Gripple & Hale6665A OLD DOMINION DRMC LEAN, VA 22101-4508UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in storing cultures and organisms; and media for use in medical laboratories for diagnostic purposes, namely diagnostic reagents for scientific or research use including glycerol solution and buffers, phosphate buffered saline, glycerol, peptone and sucroseSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005Nutrient media for use in medical laboratories for diagnostic purposes in human medicine, media for use in medical laboratories for diagnostic purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 28, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 21, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 18, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 18, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 30, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 7, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 19, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 12, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 7, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance