USPTO serial 79022028
BASEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3228148Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 10, 2007
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BASEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FI-04300 Tuusula, FI
FI-04300 Tuusula, FI
FI-04300 Tuusula, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Havlick
Scott S. Havlick Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Denver, CO 80201-8749UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Diagnostic x-ray apparatuses; dental x-ray apparatuses; dental chairs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |