Drawing for PARADOX

USPTO serial 79022128

PARADOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARADOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewellery namely rings, earrings, bracelets, chains, necklaces, pendants; horological and chronometric instruments and their parts namely hands for clocks and watches, watch cases, watch bands, watch dials, watch chains, watches used as chronographs, chronometers, clocks, watches, wristwatches, jewellery watches, diving watches, movements for clocks, movements for watches, watch glassesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 11, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 24, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 2, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 2, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 2, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 31, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 31, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 31, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance