USPTO serial 79022157
TURBAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TURBAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | power operated blowers, vacuum condensers, vacuum turbines not for land vehicles, vacuum pumps, for the pulp and paper industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 27, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |