Drawing for THERMAE ROMANAE

USPTO serial 79022176

THERMAE ROMANAE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THERMAE ROMANAE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stuart E.Benson

STUART E BENSON MANELLI DENISON & SELTER PLLC2000 M ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumery goods, bath and shower foams and gels, ant-wrinkle creams, and hair lotionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2011DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 6, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 27, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 28, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 8, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 1, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 27, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 29, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 12, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 22, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Dec 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 6, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 5, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 5, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 3, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 27, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance