USPTO serial 79022201
RIFKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3369543Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 15, 2008
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIFKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
DOUGLAS R WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices; lip gloss in a box, lip gloss in liquid form, lip gloss in a tube; lipstick; vitamin enhanced lipstick, gloss lipstick, lip balm, lip balm in a tube; lip balm in a box; roll-on lip balm, lip-enlarging balm; cosmetic pencils, namely, wooden lip pencils; cosmetic pencils, namely, propelling lip pencil; propelling cosmetics liners, namely, eye liner, lip liner; blusher, liquid blusher, blusher in a tube, stick blusher; make-up powder, namely, bronze powder, mosaic powder; shimmering make-up for cheeks; eye liner in solid form; wooden eye pencil; propelling eye pencil; powder eye pencil; eye brow color; mascara, lengthening and thickening mascara, transparent mascara, waterproof mascara; cosmetic preparations for eye lashes, namely, eye lash thickener; eye shadows, cream eye shadows, individual eye shadows, triple eye shadow, make-up kits comprised of eye shadow; make-up powder, namely, glimmer, glimmer dust; make-up powder, namely, shimmering powder; foundation, liquid foundation, powder foundation, powder cream foundation stick, cream powder foundation, oil-free foundation; solid powder, namely, pressed face powder, make-up powder; loose powder; concealer; facial cleansing mousse; eye make-up remover; facial toner; make-up removing cleansing gel; deep-cleansing cream, facial scrubs, namely, deep-cleansing scrub; skin moisturizer; facial mask; self-tanning cream; coloring preparations for cosmetic purposes, namely, water colors for use as cosmetics; coloring preparations for cosmetic purposes, namely, cream colors for use as cosmetics; artificial eye lashes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | combs and sponges, namely, make up sponges, sponges for applying body powder; sponges, namely, abrasive sponges for scrubbing the skin; brushes, namely, cosmetic brushes, eye brow brushes, mascara brushes; containers for household use made of glassware, porcelain and earthenware, namely, cosmetic containers sold empty; cosmetic brushes, make-up brushes, namely, powder brushes, blusher brushes, eye shadow brushes, eye liner brushes, mascara brushes; eye brow brush; lip brush; facial sponges for applying make-up, namely, cosmetic sponges; powder puffs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | advertising services; business administration and management; providing office functions; wholesale distributorship services in the field of cosmetics and wholesale ordering services in the field of cosmetics; business management of a make-up school | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops in the field(s) of cosmetics, theater make-up, airbrush makeup; providing of training, namely, training services in the field of cosmetics and make-up shows, sales techniques for sales personnel; educational services in the nature of beauty schools, namely, make-up schools | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rifka Cosmetics Reykjavik
- Other trademarks owned by Rifka Cosmetics Reykjavik
- Other trademarks owned by Rifka Cosmetics Reykjavik
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named RIFKA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 25, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |