Drawing for GETITCARD

USPTO serial 79022271

GETITCARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3527646Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 4, 2008
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GETITCARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Credit and cash card services; Credit card services; Credit card transaction processing services; Credit card verification; Electronic credit card transactions; Issuing credit cards; Debit card servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Aug 26, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 26, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 6, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Apr 6, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 5, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 5, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 12, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 12, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 4, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 4, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 17, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 4, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2008NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED
Jun 7, 2008NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED
Apr 4, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 4, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 19, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 19, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 4, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 4, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 8, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
May 8, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Apr 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 11, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 23, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 5, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 4, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance