Drawing for UBZ

USPTO serial 79022376

UBZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3211667Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 20, 2007
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UBZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines used for processing aluminum and steel sections as well as synthetic materials and composite materials, namely machines for milling, drilling, for waxing, welding, grinding and tapping as well as setup blocks and clamping chucks, assembled in a machining centre; machine tools, namely gear cutters, milling cutters, thread milling cutters, grinding tools for grinding machines, saw blades, drillsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Mar 27, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 12, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 9, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 9, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 8, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 17, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 20, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Mar 20, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Mar 20, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 20, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2009RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 5, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 21, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Jun 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 4, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance