USPTO serial 79022385
SILKOLENE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3247771Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 29, 2007
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SILKOLENE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. McKenna
Richard J. McKenna FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K Street, N.W. Suite 600Washington, DC 20007-5109UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 1, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |