Drawing for MARASKA MARASCHINO

USPTO serial 79022392

MARASKA MARASCHINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3378791Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 5, 2008
Examiner
PERRY,KIMBERLY B
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MARASKA MARASCHINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jan Tamulewicz

Jan Tamulewicz Myers Wolin, LLC100 S. Jefferson Road, Suite 202Whippany, NJ 07981-1009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Distilled spirits, liqueurs made from maraska cherriesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 22, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 8, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 19, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Aug 19, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 19, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Aug 19, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 19, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jul 30, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 30, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 17, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 17, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 30, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 20, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED
Sep 20, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Sep 9, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Aug 30, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Aug 30, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 6, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 6, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 5, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 5, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 20, 2007ISIRWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST
Oct 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 25, 2007PBIRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST
Sep 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2007CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED
Mar 2, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 27, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 24, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 11, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance