USPTO serial 79022471
PHOETON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3344391Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2007
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHOETON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS PLLC625 SLATERS LN 4TH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Metalworking machine tools; cutting machines for metalworking; metal fusion bonding machines; metal welding machines; metal melting machines; drilling machines for metalworking; glass working machines; cutting machines for glass working; drilling machines for glass working; glass fusion bonding machines; glass melting machines; drilling machines for plastic processing; cutting machines for plastic processing; plastic fusion bonding machines; removal machines for plastic processing to remove rubber, plastic and resin from the surface of metal; plastic melting machines; semiconductor manufacturing machines; drilling machines for rubber-goods manufacturing; cutting machines for rubber goods manufacturing; rubber fusion bonding machines; removal machines for rubber goods manufacturing to remove rubber, plastic and resin from the surface of metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | optical apparatus and instruments, namely, homogenizers and optical units, each being a component part of one of the following: metalworking machine tools, cutting machines for metalworking, metal fusion bonding machines, metal welding machines, metal melting machines, drilling machines for metalworking, glass working machines, cutting machines for glass working, drilling machines for glass working, glass fusion bonding machines, glass melting machines, drilling machines for plastic processing, cutting machines for plastic processing, plastic fusion bonding machines, removal machines for plastic processing to remove rubber, plastic and resin from the surface of metal, plastic melting machines, semiconductor manufacturing machines, drilling machines for rubber-goods manufacturing, cutting machines for rubber goods manufacturing, rubber fusion bonding machines, and removal machines for rubber goods manufacturing to remove rubber, plastic and resin from the surface of metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 13, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |