Drawing for AHR ARMANI HOTELS & RESORTS

USPTO serial 79022554

AHR ARMANI HOTELS & RESORTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3708750Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 10, 2009
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AHR ARMANI HOTELS & RESORTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043PROVIDING FOOD AND DRINK TO HOTEL AND RESORT GUESTS; PROVIDING TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATIONSSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 14, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 1, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 13, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 6, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 24, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 2, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 1, 2010CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Mar 8, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 10, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 11, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 25, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 21, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 16, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 15, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 16, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 15, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 16, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 15, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 11, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 11, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 9, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 9, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 9, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 8, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 8, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 24, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 11, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance