USPTO serial 79022561
MARIA CALLAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4054491Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 15, 2011
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARIA CALLAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo M. Loughlin
Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc607 14th Street NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS, NAMELY, GOLD, SILVER, PLATINUM; GOODS MADE OF OR COATED WITH GOLD, SILVER, PLATINUM, NAMELY, NECKLACES, RINGS, BRACELETS, BROOCHES; JEWELRY; PRECIOUS STONES; HOROLOGICAL AND CHRONOMETRIC INSTRUMENTS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |