Drawing for ARATI

USPTO serial 79022647

ARATI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3373190Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 22, 2008
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARATI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yoichiro Yamaguchi, Tomoko Nakajima

TOMOKO NAKAJIMA RADER FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC1233 20TH ST NW STE 501WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics; non-medicated toiletries; perfumery; soaps, namely, bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form, body cream soap, cosmetic soaps, cream soaps, deodorant soaps, hand soaps, liquid soaps for hands, face and body, perfumed soap, skin soap, shaving soap, hair shampoo, facial cleanser; dentifricesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 14, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 25, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jul 25, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 25, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 29, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Aug 29, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 3, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 13, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 28, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 22, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 11, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 11, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 28, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 28, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 28, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 28, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 30, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 8, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 2, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 2, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 11, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance