USPTO serial 79022680
RADIOBUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RADIOBUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Hobbs, Jr.
Michael D. Hobbs, Jr. Troutman Sanders LLP600 Peachtree Street NEBank of America Plaza Suite 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic apparatus, namely, radio control systems, namely radio transmitters and receivers for industrial equipment and parts therefor | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2010 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |