Drawing for UNA SPREMUTA DI OLIVE

USPTO serial 79022682

UNA SPREMUTA DI OLIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3242698Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 15, 2007
Examiner
SAPP, HEATHER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with UNA SPREMUTA DI OLIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Olive oilsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 25, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 20, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 20, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 19, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 5, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 15, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 11, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Dec 5, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Dec 5, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 8, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Nov 8, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 2, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Nov 16, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 26, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 25, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 15, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 8, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 8, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 4, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 14, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 11, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance