USPTO serial 79022692
VIRTUDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIRTUDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VANESSA HWANG LUI
VANESSA HWANG LUI FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | wines of the Alentejo region | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 8, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |