Drawing for DFC

USPTO serial 79022727

DFC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3427001Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 13, 2008
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with DFC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin M. Kercher

Kevin M. Kercher McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.801 Grand Ave., Ste. 3200Des Moines, IA 50309-2721United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Parts for airplanes, namely, wall elements for interior lining, provided with a decorative coating or plating to improve the appearance of the airplane partsACTIVE
037Furniture varnishing, varnishing, coating and painting of work piece surfaces, namely, of parts for vehicles, namely, wall elements, vehicle bodies, console elements, namely, vehicle dashboards and center consoles, control elements, namely, steering wheels and control levers.ACTIVE
040Printing, plating of metals and nickel plating, tin plating and chrome plating of plasticsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 22, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 22, 2024EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED
Feb 22, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 22, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 22, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Apr 12, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 12, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 10, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Nov 21, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED
Nov 21, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Nov 20, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 6, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Nov 6, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 13, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 13, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 22, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 21, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 19, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 18, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 26, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 4, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 9, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Apr 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 5, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 25, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 25, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 22, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 18, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance