Drawing for SHANDA

USPTO serial 79022773

SHANDA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3220336Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 20, 2007
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SHANDA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherry L. Rollo

Sherry L. Rollo Hahn Loeser & Parks, LLP200 West MadisonSuite 2700Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer programming; computer software design; updating of computer software; rental of computer software; recovery of computer data; maintenance of computer software; consultancy in the field of computer hardware, namely, consultancy services related to the design, development, selection, implementation, and use of computer hardware; computer systems analysis; rental of computers; rental of computer data in the form of application softwareACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 2, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 9, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 11, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 11, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 11, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 14, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 3, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 28, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Mar 28, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Mar 28, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 12, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Mar 12, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jul 29, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 29, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 19, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 10, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 11, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Aug 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 26, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
May 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 18, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance