USPTO serial 79022789
RUBRAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3258907Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 3, 2007
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with RUBRAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Osaka 550-0013, JP
Osaka 550-0013, JP
Osaka 550-0013, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Scott Alprin
M. Scott Alprin Alprin Law Offices, P.C.5 Pinehurst Circle, N.W.Washington, DC 20015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Non-electric massage devices and apparatus, namely, [shoulder tapping device for massage,] massage device for pressing pressure points for personal use, massage device for giving stimulus to effective points for personal use, massage device for shiatsu massage, [aesthetic massage apparatus for industrial purposes; electric massage apparatus for household use] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |