Drawing for LIVING AT HOME

USPTO serial 79022813

LIVING AT HOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3557629Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 6, 2009
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVING AT HOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marc Ackerman, Christopher Glancy, Carol Witschel, Jonathan Moskin, Stefan Mentzer, Jennifer Co

MARC ACKERMAN, CHRISTOPHER GLANCY, CAROL WHITE & CASE LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter and publications, namely, magazines featuring information regarding home decoration, home design, home organization, and hosting information.SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 10, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 8, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 1, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 10, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 6, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 21, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 15, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 13, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 28, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 27, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 26, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 26, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 25, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 18, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance