USPTO serial 79022841
Serial No. 79022841
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3280109Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2007
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79022841?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN M RABIN
STEVEN M RABIN RABIN & BERDO PC1101 14TH ST NWSTE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005-5633Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Vessels and their structural parts and fittings, namely, sailing vessels and their structural parts and fittings; Aircraft and their structural parts and fittings; Railway rolling stock and their structural parts and fittings; Automobiles and their structural parts and fittings; Two-wheeled motor vehicles and their structural parts and fittings; Bicycles and their structural parts and fittings; Baby carriages prams; Wheelchairs; Rickshaws; Sleighs and sleds; Wheelbarrows; Carts; Horse drawn carriages; Bicycle trailers, namely, Riyakah; Ropeways for cargo or freight handling; Unloading tipplers for tilting railway freight cars; Mine car pushers; Mine car pullers; Tractors; Non-electric prime movers for land vehicles not including their parts, namely, internal combustion engines; Machine elements for land vehicles, namely, bearings; AC motors or DC motors for land vehicles not including their parts; Anti-theft alarms for vehicles; Parachutes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | [ Coffee and cocoa; Unprocessed coffee; Tea; Seasonings; Spices; Aromatic preparations for food not from essential oils; Husked rice; Husked oats; Husked barley; Flour for food; Gluten for food; Cereal preparations; Stuffed Chinese dumplings, namely, Gyoza, cooked; Sandwiches; Steamed Chinese dumplings, namely, Shumai, cooked; Sushi; Fried balls of batter mixed with small pieces of octopus, namely, Takoyaki; Steamed buns stuffed with minced meat, namely, Niku-manjuh; Prepared hamburgers; Prepared pizzas; Prepared hot dog sandwiches; Prepared meat pies; Prepared ravioli;] Confectionery, namely, candies, confectionery chips for baking, pastilles, frozen confections and fruit jellies; [ bread and buns; Instant confectionery mixes, namely, frosting mixes; Ice cream mixes; Sherbet mixes; Almond paste; Yeast powder; Fermenting malted rice, namely, Koji; Yeast; Baking powder; Ice; Binding agents for ice cream; Meat tenderizers for household purposes; Preparations for stiffening whipped cream ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 034 | Tobacco; Cigarette paper; Smokers' articles not of precious metal, namely, ashtrays for smokers and lighters for smokers; Matches | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Harvey Ball Smile Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Harvey Ball Smile Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Harvey Ball Smile Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |