Drawing for LEY'S

USPTO serial 79022857

LEY'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEY'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Cocoa products, namely, cocoa; tea substitutes; tea-based beverages; candy, namely, sweetmeats; confectionary, namely, marzipan and nougat; starch products for food, namely, corn starch and potato starch; ice cream; soybean milk, and condiments, namely, ketchup and mustardABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 30, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 9, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 9, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 9, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 20, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 31, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 30, 2007OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2007OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
May 29, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 3, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 25, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance