Drawing for LEY'S

USPTO serial 79022857

LEY'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEY'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Cocoa products, namely, cocoa; tea substitutes; tea-based beverages; candy, namely, sweetmeats; confectionary, namely, marzipan and nougat; starch products for food, namely, corn starch and potato starch; ice cream; soybean milk, and condiments, namely, ketchup and mustardABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 28, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 30, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 9, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 9, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Oct 9, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Oct 9, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Oct 9, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Sep 20, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 31, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Aug 30, 2007OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB
Aug 30, 2007OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED
May 29, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
May 1, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 8, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 6, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 6, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 6, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 5, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 5, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 3, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 25, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance