USPTO serial 79022867
COLLARDAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3225326Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2007
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLLARDAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
David Richard BLOOM; and Jayseelan Nadasen PADAYACHY
GB
Other trademarks owned by David Richard BLOOM; and Jayseelan Nadasen PADAYACHY
David Richard BLOOM; and Jayseelan Nadasen PADAYACHY
GB
Other trademarks owned by David Richard BLOOM; and Jayseelan Nadasen PADAYACHY
David Richard BLOOM; and Jayseelan Nadasen PADAYACHY
GB
Other trademarks owned by David Richard BLOOM; and Jayseelan Nadasen PADAYACHY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Liane L. Churney
LIANE L CHURNEY FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS PC2026 RAMBLING RDKALAMAZOO, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by David Richard BLOOM; and Jayseelan Nadasen PADAYACHY
- Other trademarks owned by David Richard BLOOM; and Jayseelan Nadasen PADAYACHY
- Other trademarks owned by David Richard BLOOM; and Jayseelan Nadasen PADAYACHY
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named COLLARDAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |