Drawing for HAIR COMPANY

USPTO serial 79022892

HAIR COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3467992Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 15, 2008
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with HAIR COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard J. Groos

Richard J. Groos King & Spalding LLP500 West 2nd Street, 1800Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair products, namely, [ hair spray, hair conditioners, ] hair dyes, [ hair waving preparations, detergent, soaps, ] bleaching products, namely, bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes; [ fabric softeners; soaps; bleaching preparations and other substances, namely, laundry soaps for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; cosmetics in general, namely, perfumes, perfumes in solid form, deodorants, soaps, liquid soaps, cakes of soap, bath foam, foaming bath gels, foaming bath beads, toothpastes, shampoos, essential oils, ] hair lotions, [ preparations for permanent hair waves and for setting hair, ] hair gels [, face creams, mascara, eye liners, eye shadows, make-up pencils, face powder, lipsticks, foundations, body creams, nail polish, nail hardeners, sun tanning oils and creams ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 3, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 18, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 31, 2021FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 15, 2021GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 5, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 18, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 5, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Apr 5, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Mar 24, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 20, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 24, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 12, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 21, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 13, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jan 13, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jan 13, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 13, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Dec 13, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Nov 13, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 26, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 26, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 26, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 24, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Nov 16, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 25, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 1, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Sep 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 13, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 12, 2007LIECLEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION
Sep 12, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 5, 2007IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED
Jan 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 14, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 25, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance