Drawing for YIELDMAX

USPTO serial 79022917

YIELDMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3401975Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 25, 2008
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with YIELDMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy Brozenic

Amy Brozenic Lathrop GPM LLP10851 Mastin Blvd.Building 82, Suite 1000Overland Park, KS 66210-1669

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Enzymes for industrial purposes, namely, for the manufacture of cheeseACTIVE
029Microbial rennet for the manufacture of cheeseACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 21, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 2, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 23, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED
Jun 5, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 14, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Mar 14, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Mar 14, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 22, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Sep 8, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 9, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 29, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 29, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 22, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 3, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 17, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Mar 17, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 30, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 11, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 25, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 4, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 16, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 29, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 25, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 15, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 12, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 1, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jun 1, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
May 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 29, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 29, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 8, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 31, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 30, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 25, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance