USPTO serial 79022942
GOLDFINGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3356522Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 18, 2007
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLDFINGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine J. Holland
RECHTSANWäLTE LANDSTRAßE 12/ARKADEMAG THOMAS RIEDLERDR HINTERMAYR & PARTNERA LINZ, 4020Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Flours; cereal preparations, namely processed cereals, cereal-based snack foods; farinaceous food pastes for human consumption; bread; pieces of bread; pre-baked bread, namely dough; bread rolls; pre-baked bread rolls, namely bread roll dough; bakery goods; pastries; confectionery goods, namely, candy; chocolate; chocolate products, namely, chocolate bars, chocolate syrup; chocolate masses and chocolate for icing; cocoa powder; cocoa products, namely cocoa, cocoa spreads; nougat; nougat products, namely, candy with nougat; pralines; baking powder; bread mixes; bread balls known as "Knödel" and dough balls known as "Knödel"; baked and pre-baked dietetic bread and other dietetic bakery goods not for medical use; prefabricated dough portions, also deep-frozen, intended for preparing bread, bread rolls, bakery and pastry goods; spices; mixtures of spices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | [ Services for providing food and drink, namely, restaurant services, serving food and drinks; catering services ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Backaldrin Österreich GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Backaldrin Österreich GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Backaldrin Österreich GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named GOLDFINGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | C7P. | CANCELLED SEC. 7 - PARTIAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | C7PF | RQST FOR SECT 7 PARTIAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | C7P. | CANCELLED SEC. 7 - PARTIAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | C7PF | RQST FOR SECT 7 PARTIAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |