Drawing for LE NATURAL PRODUCT DESIGNER

USPTO serial 79024040

LE NATURAL PRODUCT DESIGNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3373197Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 22, 2008
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LE NATURAL PRODUCT DESIGNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrice P. Jean

Patrice P. Jean Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLPOne Battery Park PlazaNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use, namely, laundry detergent; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations, namely, liquids and powders for general purposes; cosmetic soaps, detergent soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, dentifrices; plant extracts, namely, essential oils used in manufacture of body, skin and face cream, lotions and gelsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035[ Advertising, business management, business administration, providing office functions; distribution of prospectuses and samples; newspaper subscription services for third parties; business consulting, information or inquiries; accounting; document reproduction; employment agencies; computer file management, namely, computerized database file management; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes, namely, in the field of cosmetic, food, healthcare and phytotherapy and in the field of finished products containing plant extracts used in cosmetics, food industry, healthcare and phytotherapy ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific and industrial research; services of engineers, namely, engineering, professional consultancy in the field of cosmetics, plant extracts, ingredients, raw materials used in cosmetics, food industry, healthcare and phytotherapy and in the field of finished products containing plant extracts used in cosmetics, food industry, healthcare and phytotherapy; Technical product prospecting, namely, technical analysis of product in the field of plant extracts used in cosmetics, food industry, healthcare and phytotherapy and in the field of finished products containing plant extracts used in cosmetics, food industry, healthcare and phytotherapy, materials testing; medical research laboratories in cosmetologySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 5, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2016CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD—
Jan 13, 2016EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 10, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 18, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 5, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 5, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2014C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 7, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 21, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 21, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 22, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 14, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 3, 2007DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Oct 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 26, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 18, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 6, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 6, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance