USPTO serial 79024040
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrice P. Jean
Patrice P. Jean Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLPOne Battery Park PlazaNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use, namely, laundry detergent; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations, namely, liquids and powders for general purposes; cosmetic soaps, detergent soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, dentifrices; plant extracts, namely, essential oils used in manufacture of body, skin and face cream, lotions and gels | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | [ Advertising, business management, business administration, providing office functions; distribution of prospectuses and samples; newspaper subscription services for third parties; business consulting, information or inquiries; accounting; document reproduction; employment agencies; computer file management, namely, computerized database file management; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes, namely, in the field of cosmetic, food, healthcare and phytotherapy and in the field of finished products containing plant extracts used in cosmetics, food industry, healthcare and phytotherapy ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and industrial research; services of engineers, namely, engineering, professional consultancy in the field of cosmetics, plant extracts, ingredients, raw materials used in cosmetics, food industry, healthcare and phytotherapy and in the field of finished products containing plant extracts used in cosmetics, food industry, healthcare and phytotherapy; Technical product prospecting, namely, technical analysis of product in the field of plant extracts used in cosmetics, food industry, healthcare and phytotherapy and in the field of finished products containing plant extracts used in cosmetics, food industry, healthcare and phytotherapy, materials testing; medical research laboratories in cosmetology | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |