USPTO serial 79025042
ORGANIC S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORGANIC S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | ELECTRIC MANICURE SETS; DEPILATION APPLIANCES, ELECTRIC AND NON-ELECTRIC; RAZOR CASES; PALETTE KNIVES; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, FILES; MANICURE IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, FINGERNAIL POLISHERS, ELECTRIC OR NON-ELECTRIC; NON-ELECTRIC HAND IMPLEMENTS FOR HAIR CURLING, NAMELY, HAIR CLIPPERS, HAIR TRIMMERS, CURLING IRONS, FLAT IRONS; NON-ELECTRONIC HAIR POLISHING IRONS; ELECTRIC HAIR CURLING IRONS AND TONGS; HAIR CLIPPERS FOR PERSONAL USE, ELECTRIC; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, BLADES FOR SHEARS, SCISSORS BLADES; ELECTRIC NAIL FILES; MANICURE IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, CUTICLE TWEEZERS; NAIL NIPPERS; PEDICURE IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY NAIL FILES, NAIL CLIPPERS, CUTICLE PUSHERS, TWEEZERS, RAZORS, ELECTRIC OR NON-ELECTRIC, RAZOR BLADES, RAZOR STROPS; SHAVING CASES, NAMELY, SHAVING BAGS SOLD EMPTY, SCISSORS; MULTI-PURPOSE SHEARS; HAND HELD CUTTING TOOLS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Non-electric appliances for removing make-up, namely, facial sponges; Brushes for bath and for cosmetic purposes, Brush goods, namely, eyebrow brushes, hair brushes, hair tinting brushes, nail brushes, lip brushes, make-up brushes, power-operated brush used to clean and exfoliate the skin, shaving brushes, washing brushes; Electric brushes for cosmetic; Electric combs for the hair; Beverage glassware, Drinking glasses; Hair combs; Napkin holders not precious metal; Towel holders and towel rings, not of precious metal; Household utensils, namely, pot and pan scrapers, rolling pins, spatulas, turners,whisks; Abrasive sponges for scrubbing the skin; Comb cases; Cosmetic utensils, namely, brushes, cosmetic, spatulas for use with depilatory preparations, droppers sold empty for cosmetic purposes, foam applicator sticks for applying cosmetics and administering pharmaceuticals, non-woven fabric cosmetic wipes, not paper; Figures of china, crystal, earthenware, glass, porcelain; Combs; Large-toothed combs for the hair; Isothermic bags, namely,thermal insulated bags for food or beverages; Cups for fruits; Cups of paper or plastic; Dispensers for paper towels made of metal; Paper plates; Shaving brushes; Shaving brush stands; Signboards of porcelain or glass; Soapboxes; Soap holders; Soap dispensers; Toilet utensils, namely, holders for toilet paper, toilet brushes, toilet paper dispensers, toilet roll holders, toilet sponges, toilet tissue holders; Toiletry cases sold empty; Drinking vessels and glasses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 026 | elastic ribbons; hair bands; hair caps as applicators for hair colouring; hairgrips; hairpins; hairnets; bows for the hair; hair ornaments; barrettes; false hair for hair styling; false plaited hair styling; curl paper, hair curling pins; wigs; toupees | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 5, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |