USPTO serial 79026121
D-DRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with D-DRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for single-axis and multi-axis positioning of items, comprising materials having piezoelectric properties and which are stacked to actuators, and mechanical guiding systems based on solid state hinges and linear motors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Scientific electronic apparatus and instruments, namely, precision micro positioning systems and mechanical guiding systems; single-axis and multi-axis actuating and positioning systems, comprising linear motors for microscopes, stages for wafer handling, namely, platforms for taking-up and transporting wafers during manufacturing and shipment, and linear stages for precision movement of camera parts; tilting platforms for optical elements and active optics; electronic data processing systems integrated into mechanical guiding systems for multi axis movement; computer and computer software for operating actuating and positioning systems; electrically controllable mechanical shifting equipment, namely, precision positioning systems and actuators and control units for such equipment; integrated displacement sensors for mechanical positioning systems; encapsulated and unencapsulated multilayer-actuators; engines for precise adjustment in optics, semiconductor handling and inspection systems and for precision alignment and handling systems; ultrasonic transducers; micro positioning stages for optical waveguides and fiber optics; multi mode switches for optical waveguides; optical apparatus and instruments, namely, spectrometers, optical and semiconductor inspection systems integrated into a mechanical guiding system; optical data storage carriers, the systems, platforms, engines, transducers, and actuators each including a piezo-electric material, the piezo-electric material changing its shape when subjected to a voltage | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Development of computer software for piezo-electronic drive systems for single-axis and multi-axis positioning systems as well as for precision micro positioning systems including for controlling of micro positioning stages for optical waveguides and fiber optics; development of piezo-electric drive systems for single-axis and multi-axis positioning systems, piezo-tilting platforms for optical elements and active optics, encapsulated and unencapsulated piezo multilayer actuators, piezo engines, piezo ultrasonic transducers, micro positioning stages for optical waveguides and fiber optics as well as multi mode switch for optical waveguides; research in the field of technique, namely, development of precise actuators and sensors for measurement of precise motions, including development of electronic systems and software for such components; technical measurement evaluation in the optics and semiconductor industry and in the field of industry of precision alignment and handling systems | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 28, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 9, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 2, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |