Drawing for KILTIE

USPTO serial 79026505

KILTIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3356536Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 18, 2007
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KILTIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. Jeffrey B. Sladkus, LLC1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, overcoats, raincoats, waistcoats, jackets, trousers, shirts, T-shirts, knitwear, namely, blouses and pullovers; shawls, suits, dresses, sweatshirts, stockings, socks, ties, tights, headscarves, scarves, underwear, belts, footwear, namely, boots, shoes and slippers; headgear, namely, hats and capsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Oct 28, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 11, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 31, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 15, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jul 15, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Mar 25, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 25, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 7, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 4, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 4, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 18, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 24, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 24, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 24, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 24, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 20, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 13, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
May 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Aug 31, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance